| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perinatal TransmissionBabies of HIV-positive women are believed to have about a 25% risk of becoming HIV-infected, without interventions, such as the use of AZT (by mother and child), formula feeding and cesarean sections. Is it a coincidence that all of these interventions makes money for the industrial medical system? Is there strong evidence that the health of the children (and mothers) is improved by these interventions? Is HIV status a valid measure of success of interventions, without evidence that health is improved?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We appreciate your comments, feedback, questions and suggestions for improvements to this site. Click here to send us a message.
© Copyright February 15, 2016: Alberta Reappraising AIDS Society